top of page
Search

The 5 Risks Hidden Inside Most Succession Plans.

Apr 5
1 min read

Your succession plan is more fragile than you think.



It looks structured.


It has names.


It has “ready now” and “ready soon” labels.



And yet, when a critical leader exits, the organisation scrambles.



I’ve seen this too often in succession discussions. On paper, there is confidence.


In reality, there are gaps no one has fully examined. Because most succession plans are designed to reassure.



Not to expose risk.



So the conversation stays comfortable:



“We have a strong successor.”


“She’s been excellent in her current role.”


“He knows the business well.”



All of which may be true.


And still not enough.



The real issue is this:


Succession risk rarely sits in who you have named. It sits in what you haven’t tested.



- Single-point dependencies.


- Readiness that has never been stretched.


- Roles that will change faster than your successors can.


- Bench strength that looks deeper than it actually is.


- Decisions driven by familiarity, not evidence.



By the time these show up, it is already expensive.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Why Senior Hires Fail.

Some of the most capable senior leaders I’ve assessed didn’t fail because they lacked skill or experience. They failed because alignment was assumed, not engineered. That’s the uncomfortable reality o

 
 
 
HR Head VS CHRO.

Most people don’t know the difference between an HR Head and a CHRO. But CEOs do. Boards do. An HR Head is critical. A CHRO is indispensable. Here’s the difference and it has nothing to do with years

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page